Motion
A proposal written precisely enough to be decided — stating what changes, who decides, and by when.
Ask to read the last proposal a community decided, not a summary of it. A real one says what changes, who may decide it, and by when. Then ask what happened between voting closing and the decision taking effect. If the answer is "nothing", that can be exactly right — but it should be a choice the group made on purpose rather than one it arrived at by never asking.
A motion is a proposal in its final, decidable form. The plainer word is proposal, and most communities use that; “motion” is what it becomes once it is written tightly enough that agreeing to it and agreeing to something adjacent are no longer the same act.
The distinction sounds pedantic and is the origin of an enormous share of community disputes. A group discusses composting for an hour, everyone nods, and it is minuted as “agreed to improve composting”. Six weeks later two people are arguing, both entirely sincerely, about whether that meant buying a tumbler or rebuilding the bays. Nothing went wrong in the meeting. There was simply never a sentence anyone could have voted against.
What a workable motion states
Four things, and the fourth is the one most often left out.
- What changes — in the specific, not the aspirational. “Spend up to €1,800 from the maintenance fund on two compost bays, built before the end of October” rather than “invest in composting”.
- Who is deciding it — the whole membership, or the circle whose domain it falls in. If a group cannot answer this before the vote, it will answer it afterwards, badly.
- By when — when voting opens and closes, so nobody discovers the decision after it was made.
- What would have counted as a no — the bar it has to clear, and how many people must take part for the result to count at all. Deciding this after seeing the numbers is the oldest way there is to lose an argument twice.
Why writing it down changes the decision
A motion forces the proposer to do the work of being specific before forty people spend an evening on it, which is why groups that adopt written proposals usually report shorter meetings rather than longer ones. It also creates the thing a community has to be able to point at in a year: not what the room felt, but what it agreed.
Motions are also where consensus and consent differ from a straight vote. Both expect the wording to change in response to objections — the motion is a draft under those methods, not a fixed text, and a group that treats it as fixed has kept the vocabulary and lost the practice.
Sources & further reading
- 1 RCOS Core — Layer 2: Governance & Decision Logic — specifies proposal submission requirements as part of a governance protocol
- 2 VoteCast — glossary — where EcoHubs implements written proposals; it calls this a proposal
Written by EcoHubs members, with AI assistance for drafting and editing, and reviewed by a person before publication. Facts are checked against the sources listed; anything we could not verify is marked. How this is written
Related terms
A window after a proposal is published and before voting opens, during which nothing is counted yet.
A hold between a proposal passing and it taking effect, during which the result is confirmed before it becomes real.
The minimum number of members who must take part before a result counts at all.