Childcare, schooling, teenagers, growing old and dying — the decades most accounts skip.
10 min read·Lesson 8 of 11
This is the lesson that decides it for a lot of families, and it is the one most often left out — partly because it is unromantic and partly because the honest answers are mixed.
Small children
The practical case is real and it is the thing parents most often report. Someone else is around. A meal you did not cook arrives three times a week. There are adults your child knows well who are not you.
The complications are equally real and less discussed.
Shared childcare is rarely as shared as it sounds. Most communities have no formal childcare at all — what they have is proximity, which turns into help unevenly and usually along familiar lines. Ask whether childcare here is a rota, a favour, or paid work. All three exist and they behave completely differently when someone is tired.
Other people have opinions about your child. In a street this is a raised eyebrow. In a community it is a conversation, possibly a meeting. Communities differ enormously in whether an adult may correct someone else’s child, and the ones that have never discussed it are the ones where it goes wrong.
Children are a workload the community shares unevenly. Households without children often subsidise, through both money and tolerance, things only families use. This is one of the most common quiet resentments in community life, and naming it early is how communities defuse it.
Schooling
Start with the law, because it constrains everything else and people routinely get this backwards.
Home education is lawful in the United Kingdom and in most of the United States. It is illegal in Germany, and has been since 1918 — a ban the European Court of Human Rights upheld unanimously in Wunderlich v. Germany in January 2019, holding that compulsory school attendance pursues legitimate aims including avoiding the emergence of parallel societies, and that removing the children of parents who refused to comply was proportionate. Whatever you think of that, it is the legal reality in a country with a very active community movement.
So the first question about a community’s beautiful plan for its own learning group is not whether it is a good idea. It is what the plan actually is, legally: a registered school, a supplementary group alongside compulsory attendance, or an intention nobody has tested.
Beyond the law, the practical questions are duller and more predictive. How far is the school, and is there a bus? Do the children here go to the same school, or six different ones? A community whose children scatter across half a county shares far less than the brochure implies, because the school run is where family time goes.
Teenagers
Adolescence is the hardest test a community’s culture faces, for a reason that is structural rather than about anybody’s parenting.
A community is a small place where everyone knows you, and the developmental task of being fifteen is to become someone your parents did not design. Those two things are in tension. Teenagers in communities frequently report the same two complaints: that there is nowhere to be unobserved, and that there is nothing to do that was not organised by adults.
Communities that handle it well tend to do three things. They give young people somewhere that is genuinely theirs and not supervised. They give them a real say in decisions from a stated age, rather than a token one. And they accept that some teenagers will want out, and do not treat leaving as a betrayal of the project.
The ones that handle it badly treat adolescence as a failure of the community’s values, which guarantees that the young person’s exit is also a rupture.
What would your household need?
Six questions about who is in your household and what the next decade might hold. There is no score and no result — at the end you get a list of things worth asking a real community, put together from your answers.
Growing old
Here the field makes a claim it is usually careful about and occasionally is not.
Senior cohousing is designed around independent living with mutual support — private homes, shared meals, neighbours who notice. Charles Durrett, the architect who brought the model into English, is explicit that it does not replace formal caregiving when it is needed; what it supplies is a layer of informal help underneath the formal system, not instead of it. The practices that go with it have a name — co-care — and the distinction from care is the entire point.
That distinction matters because the failure mode is predictable. A group of friends in their sixties buys a site together. Twenty years later one of them needs two people to help her out of bed at three in the morning, and the community discovers that willingness is not the same as capacity, and that the person doing most of the helping is also seventy-eight.
Communities that avoid this talk about it years before it happens. Durrett’s own formation process for senior groups is a ten-week study course, run before anybody builds anything, in which prospective members work through ageing in place, the economics of later-life housing, and specifically what they will and will not take on for each other. Ten weeks of talking about incontinence and dementia before choosing a site is not most people’s idea of a housing project. It is why some of these communities work.
The physical questions are simpler and worth asking on a first visit. Which homes are step-free? Can one be adapted? Is the common house reachable without stairs, and the meeting room? A community that cannot get a wheelchair to its own governance is going to lose members before it means to.
Death, and the family who are not here
The end of the story is in the documents, and it is worth reading them before you need to.
What happens to your home is decided by which of the four legal shells you are in — freehold passes normally, a co-operative share passes as an asset though your heirs will usually need to be accepted as members to live there, a land trust home can be inherited but the heir takes the resale formula with it, and a tenancy usually ends.
The part nobody plans for is social. Your family may not be part of this community, may not have chosen it, and may arrive grieving into a place with strong opinions about how things are done. Meanwhile the community has lost someone it saw every day and has no standing in the funeral.
Communities that have been through it once tend to write something down afterwards: who is told, who has keys, what happens to the person’s things, whether the community may hold its own gathering, and who talks to the family. Ask whether they have. If somebody has died here, the answer is usually yes and the story is worth hearing.
Written by EcoHubs members, with AI assistance for drafting and editing, and reviewed by a
person before publication. Facts are checked against the sources listed; anything we could not
verify is marked. How this is written
The shared building at the centre of a cohousing project, usually a large kitchen and dining room plus what homes were built small enough to do without.
Private self-contained homes clustered around shared facilities — usually a common house — with residents managing the whole.
We use cookies to analyze site traffic and improve your experience. By clicking "Accept",
you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Privacy Policy for more information.